Henderson v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1990
Citation profile
6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
April 1992
most recently cited
6 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Batson v. Kentucky · Keeton v. State · Tompkins v. State · White v. State · Dingler v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“We hold, in light of Dingler [II], that because the copy of the judgment and sentence provided by the TDC had not been certified by the clerk of the convicting court, the pen packet was not properly authenticated, and thus was not admissible under Texas Rules of Criminal Evidence 901 or 902.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Handspur v. State“from the public office where items of this nature are kept”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Handspur v. State“bound by the authority of the Court of Criminal Appeals”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Handspur v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.