Davis v. Harvey’s Empirical Analysis
789 F.2d 1332 · 1986
Citation profile
19 federal appellate · 2 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 32 later decisions — most recently June 2009 · most notably Brooks v. City of Winston-Salem (1996), Calero-Colon v. Betancourt-Lebron (1995)
19 federal appellate · 2 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Wilson v. Garcia · Venegas v. Wagner · Gowin v. Altmiller · Kosikowski v. Bourne
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 32 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“conduct and asserted injury are discrete and complete upon occurrence, and the cause of action can reasonably be deemed to have accrued when the wrongful act occurs.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.