Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 789 F.2d 1513 - Bradberry v. Pinellas County

Bradberry v. Pinellas County’s Empirical Analysis

789 F.2d 1513 · 1986

Citation profile

89
cited by 89 later decisions
3
states following
March 2020
most recently cited

17 federal appellate · 4 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 89 later decisions — most recently March 2020 · most notably Luckey III v. Harris (1988), Little v. City of North Miami (1986)

17 federal appellate · 4 state decisions

39019861990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on Conley v. Gibson · Estelle v. Gamble · Daniels v. Williams · Paul v. Davis · Harris v. McRae

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 89 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[A] local governmental body does not deprive a person of his right to life for purposes of 42 U.S.C. § 1983 when it grossly negligently trains one of its agents.... The Constitution, as opposed to local tort law, does not prohibit grossly negligent rescue attempts nor even the grossly negligent training of state officers. Rather, it prohibits the deprivation of life, liberty, or property without due process of law. Although the state might be prohibited by the Due Process Clause from actively taking the life of a citizen through grossly negligent behavior, we do not believe that due process is implicated when the state fails to help someone already in danger. ... We decline to take such an extreme step.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “In the present case, the plaintiffs alleged that Pinellas County was grossly negligent because it inadequately trained lifeguards and one of those lifeguards proximately caused the death of Kenny Ray Thomas. We find that, on these facts, this allegation is insufficient to state a claim under Section § 1983. It is beyond peradventure that § 1983 did not make every tort committed under color of state law actionable in federal court.... Pinellas County's alleged failure to adequately train its lifeguards may have been one of the causes of Kenny Ray Thomas' death, but it did not deprive him of any right secured by the federal Constitution.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “a complaint should not be dismissed for failure to state a claim pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6) 'unless it appears beyond doubt that plaintiff can prove no set of facts that would entitle him to relief.'”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.