Davis v. Blackburn’s Empirical Analysis
789 F.2d 350 · 1986
Citation profile
7 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Townsend v. Sain · Kentucky v. Indiana · Reamer v. Beall · Anderson v. Maggio · United States v. Ernest C. Hamilton, Lloyd E. Hennigan, Jr., Philip J. Shaheen, Jr., and Henri Loridans
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[a] habeas application premised on newly discovered evidence is subject to the same standard as that for a new trial.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Boyd v. Puckett
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.