In re Aranda’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

1 federal appellate ·

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “(a) The six-month bar on CJA representation in this Court will commence twenty-eight days from the date of this decision. Schwartz may file any briefs that currently have filing deadlines falling within the next twenty-eight days, and may see through to completion any case in this Court in which his brief has been filed by the end of that twenty-eight day period. However, any panel presiding over a case in which Schwartz is representing a party is free to reconsider his continued representation. (b) The six-month bar on CJA representation in this Court applies regardless of the court making the CJA appointment. If Schwartz is mistakenly continued as CJA counsel in any case in this Court during that period, he must promptly notify this Court of the need for substitution. The present order does not bar Schwartz from CJA representation of clients in the district courts. (c) Regarding Cáliz, Schwartz must do one of the following within 14 days of the date of this order; (1) move to withdraw Caliz’s appeal if, in fact, Cáliz does not wish to proceed; (2) cure all current defaults, if Cáliz wishes to proceed with Schwartz as counsel; or (3) withdraw from the representation, if Cáliz wishes to proceed but Schwartz is unable to do so for any reason. Any motion to withdraw the appeal or to withdraw as counsel must comply with this Court’s Local Rules.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. In Re Schwartz