Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 789 F.3d 484 - Copeland v. Bieber

Copeland v. Bieber’s Empirical Analysis

789 F.3d 484 · 2015

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
January 2018
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 1 district ·

Relationships

Applies 17 U.S.C. § 101 (§ 101 of the Copyright Act of 1976)

Relies on Feist Publications, Inc. v. Rural Telephone Service Co. · Phillips v. LCI International, Inc. · Castle Rock Entertainment, Inc. v. Carol Publishing Group, Inc. · Lyons Partnership Lp v. Morris Costumes Incorporated · Apple Computer, Inc. v. Microsoft Corp.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[t]he extrinsic inquiry is an objective one, looking to specific and external criteria of substantial similarity between the original elements (and only the original elements) of a protected work and an alleged copy.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.