Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 789 F.3d 83 - United States v. Parse

United States v. Parse’s Empirical Analysis

789 F.3d 83 · 2015

Citation profile

16
cited by 16 later decisions
1
states following
August 2024
most recently cited

7 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

Appellate journey

reviewedthe decision below (from New York Southern District Court)

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1341 (White-Collar Crime Penalty Enhancement Act of 2002) · 18 U.S.C. § 1621 · 18 U.S.C. § 3663 · 18 U.S.C. § 371 · 18 U.S.C. § 401 · 26 U.S.C. § 7212

Relies on United States v. Olano · Glasser v. United States · Johnson v. Zerbst · Brady v. United States · Fay v. Noia

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “In these circumstances—in which a juror aligned herself with the government, lied pervasively in voir dire for the purpose of avoiding dismissal for cause, believed prior to the presentation of any evidence that the defendants were “ ‘crooks’ ” and expressly mentioned [the defendant] as a target of her efforts to persuade the other jurors to convict—a refusal to order a new trial for Parse would seriously affect the fairness, integrity, and public reputation of judicial proceedings.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “Actual bias is bias in fact. Implied bias, by contrast, is bias presumed as a matter of law. Finally, inferred bias is available when actual or implied bias does not apply. “Bias may be inferred when a juror discloses a fact that bespeaks a risk of partiality sufficiently significant to warrant granting the trial judge discretion to excuse the juror for cause, but not so great as to make mandatory a presumption of bias.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “A ruling that á litigant has waived a right because he failed to acquire sufficient information to make an informed decision is based on an erroneous view of the law.” (brackets, internal quotation marks, and citation omitted)). 12 . The government argues that defense counsel should be expected to consult”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.