Moore v. Madigan’s Empirical Analysis
1992
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently May 2013
2 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 21 U.S.C. § 111 · 28 U.S.C. § 1331 · 5 U.S.C. § 551 (Administrative Procedure Act of 1946) · 5 U.S.C. § 553 (Administrative Procedure Act of 1946) · 5 U.S.C. § 554 (Administrative Procedure Act of 1946) · 5 U.S.C. § 558 (Administrative Procedure Act of 1946) · 5 U.S.C. § 564 · 5 U.S.C. § 706
Relies on Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc. · Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co. · Camp v. Pitts · Bowles v. Seminole Rock & Sand Co. · White v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Before [USDA] withdraws approval from a specifically approved stockyard based upon a failure to maintain or operate the stockyard in accordance with the standards specified in the agreement, the operator of the stockyard will be informed in writing of the reasons for the proposed withdrawal of approval and, upon request, shall be afforded an opportunity for a hearing with respect to the merits or validity of the action to withdraw approval if there is a dispute regarding any material fact, in accordance with rules of practice which shall be adopted for the proceeding.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Moore v. Madigan“(a) The [formal] rules of practice in this sub-part shall be applicable to all adjudicatory proceedings under the [following] statutory provisions]:] Act of February 2, 1903, commonly known as the Cattle Contagious Diseases Act of 1903, section 3, as amended (21 U.S.C. 122). (b)(2) Adjudicatory proceedings under the regulations promulgated under the Animal Quarantine and Related Laws (21 U.S.C. 111 et seq.) for the suspension or revocation of accreditation of veterinarians (9 CFR Parts 160, 161).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Moore v. Madigan
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.