Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 789 P2D 357 - Zsupnik v. State

Zsupnik v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1990

Citation profile

25
cited by 25 later decisions
1
states following
December 2021
most recently cited

25 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 25 later decisions — most recently December 2021 · most notably Coghill v. Coghill (1992), Martech Construction Co. v. Ogden Environmental Services, Inc. (1993)

25 state decisions

1701990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on United States v. Leon · Edwards v. Arizona · Escobedo v. Illinois · Guin v. Ha · Prideaux v. State Dept. of Public Safety

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 25 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(Immediately after [being arrested], a prisoner shall have the right to telephone or otherwise communicate with the prisoner's attorney and any relative or friend”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “The statutory right to contact and consult with counsel is not an absolute one (which might involve a delay long enough to impair testing results), but, rather, a limited one of reasonable time and opportunity that can be reconciled with the implied consent statutes. ... Reasonableness will depend on the circumstances of each case, such as the amount of time between the stop and the transportation to the station, when the request is made, and how much time is needed to set up the test.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “the refusal of a telephone call after the arrestee is in custody at a station involves an intentional act in a situation where an officer can calmly reflect on his action before taking it.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.