Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 789 P2D 374 - Earley v. State

Earley v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1990

Citation profile

13
cited by 13 later decisions
5
states following
April 2009
most recently cited

12 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Katz v. United States · Maryland v. Buie · Kovacs v. Cooper · Cooksey v. State · Ravin v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “As used in [AS 11.61.110], “noise” is “unreasonably loud” if, considering the nature and purpose of the defendant’s conduct and the circumstances known to the defendant, including the nature of the location and the time of day or night, the [defendant’s] conduct involves a gross deviation from the standard of conduct that a reasonable person would follow in the same situation. “Noise” does not include speech that is constitutionally protected.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “[to satisfy the protective search doctrine, the state must prove that: '(a) the officers must have reasonable cause to believe that their safety is in danger before engaging in such a search, and (b) the search must be narrowly limited to areas where they could find dangerous persons.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “'demonstrate a factual basis for a reasonable belief that additional suspects [beyond those under police control] were present and posed a threat to the safety”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.