Lorenc v. Call’s Empirical Analysis
1990
Citation profile
4 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 20 U.S.C. § 1400 (Education for All Handicapped Children Act of 1975) · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act)) · 42 U.S.C. § 1988
Relies on Hensley v. Eckerhart · Bell v. Hood · San Antonio Independent School District v. Rodriguez · Plyler v. Doe · Gomez v. Toledo
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“`(1) that some person deprived [the plaintiff] of a right, privilege or immunity secured by the federal constitution; and (2) that such person acted under color of state law.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“an award of attorney fees to the prevailing party in any proceeding brought under 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 and other sections of the civil rights title.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“pendent to a substantial constitutional claim and which arises from a `common nucleus of operative fact.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.