Eaddy v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2001
Citation profile
28 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 660 So. 2d 237 - Rogers v. State · 576 So. 2d 953 - Saavedra v. State · 757 So. 2d 1227 - Nicholson v. State · 755 So. 2d 155 - Pryor v. State · 596 So. 2d 671 - State v. Hernandez
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 29 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“In determining what qualifies as a distinct act for purposes of deciding whether multiple acts can be charged in a single count, the spatial and temporal aspects of the multiple occurrences must be analyzed in order to determine whether the defendant had time to pause, reflect, and form a new criminal intent between the occurrences.”
13 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Gisi v. State · Binns v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.