Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

789 So. 2d 1223

McDaniel v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 2001-07-24

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently May 2018

2 state decisions

Relies on 791 So. 2d 1093 - Andrews v. Florida Parole Commission · Burch v. State · McDaniel v. State

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2001-07-24

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1Appellant seeks review of a final order denying his motion for postconviction relief filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. When the trial court denied the motion, appellant’s direct appeal from his convictions and sentences was pending review in the supreme court. McDaniel v. State, 790 So.2d 441 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000), review denied, No. SC00-895, 791 So.2d 1099 (Fla. June 20, 2001). Therefore, the trial court lacked jurisdiction to rule on the motion. Burch v. State, 721 So.2d 1198 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998) (trial court lacks jurisdiction to consider post-conviction motion while a direct appeal is still pending). Accordingly, we reverse the order, and remand with directions that the trial court again consider and rule upon the motion now that appellant’s direct appeals have been exhausted.

¶2REVERSED and REMANDED, with directions.

WEBSTER, BROWNING and POLSTON, JJ., CONCUR.
/789/so2d/1223 · .json · Public domain