Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

789 So. 2d 1246

Docket No. 1D00-2653.

Wright v. State

Louie T. WRIGHT, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 2001-08-01

Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently October 2003

4 state decisions

Relies on Weddell v. State

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2001-08-01

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Nancy A Daniels, Public Defender, and Phil Patterson, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

¶2Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, and Felicia A. Wilcox, Assistant Attorney General, and Robert R. Wheeler, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

¶3PER CURIAM.

¶4Appellant Louie Wright was convicted of dealing in stolen property. At trial, the jury was instructed that "[p]ossession of recently stolen property unless satisfactorily explained gives rise to an inference that the person in possession of the property knew or should have known that the property had been stolen." As Appellant concedes, the issue we certified to the supreme court in Weddell v. State,780 So.2d 324 (Fla. 1st DCA 2001), is not preserved in this case.

¶5AFFIRMED.

¶6BOOTH, KAHN and PADOVANO, JJ., concur.

/789/so2d/1246 · .json · Public domain