Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 789 SO2D 394 - Curtis v. State

Curtis v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2001

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
April 2015
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Bozza v. United States · 440 So. 2d 350 - Tafero v. State · Kroll v. United States · Williams v. United States · Abreau v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “As the Fifth Circuit has written: When a defendant has not been transferred from the court’s custody to a place of detention at the time his sentences are altered, service of the sentences has not officially commenced, and defendant’s rights are not impinged by the trial court’s timely alteration of his sentences. [Citations omitted.] Williams had not been removed from the trial court’s custody and thus had not commenced service of his sentence. Therefore, the court’s correction of his sentence was permissible.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.