Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 789 SO2D 482 - Lustig v. Garcia

Lustig v. Garcia’s Empirical Analysis

2001

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
June 2016
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Sapp v. Redding · SJS ENTERPRISES INC. v. Cates · 406 So. 2d 69 - Sea Tower Apart., Inc. v. Century Nat. Bk. · Haskin v. Haskin · 585 So. 2d 1149 - Palm Beach Mall, Inc. v. Walker

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “After a party seeking affirmative relief in an action tried by the court without a jury has completed the presentation of evidence, any other party may move for a dismissal on the ground that on the facts and the law the party seeking affirmative relief has shown no right to relief, without waiving the right to offer evidence if the motion is not granted. The court as trier of the facts may then determine them and render judgment against the party seeking affirmative relief or may decline to render judgment until the close of all the evidence....”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.