789 So. 2d 696 - State v. Baudier’s Empirical Analysis
2001
Citation profile
5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
October 2018
most recently cited
5 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · Boykin v. Alabama · State v. Sepulvado · 419 So. 2d 475 - State v. Lanclos · 523 So. 2d 1305 - State v. Mussall
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“In order to avoid the unfair inference that a defendant committed a particular crime simply because he is a man of criminal [bad] character, evidence of the commission of other crimes [bad acts] is inadmissible unless the evidence has an independent relevancy besides simply showing a criminal disposition.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“evidence of criminal offenses other than the offense being tried is inadmissible as substantive evidence because of the substantial risk of grave prejudice to the defendant.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“[i]n rebuttal closing argument, the State has the right to answer the arguments of defendant.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.