Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 789 SO2D 956 - McDowell v. State

McDowell v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2001

Citation profile

12
cited by 12 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
1
states following
August 2008
most recently cited

11 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Apprendi v. New Jersey · McMillan v. Pennsylvania · Weatherford v. Bursey · Grant v. State · State v. Cotton

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[T]he [PRR] Act does not increase the maximum statutory penalty. Here the sentencing court's discretion in selecting a penalty within the statutory range is simply limited. Accordingly, proof to the jury of a defendant's release which subjects a defendant to a sentence under the Act is not required.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.