Lydic v. Manker’s Empirical Analysis
1990
Citation profile
8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
August 2007
most recently cited
8 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Murphy v. Carron · 32 Cal. 3d 689 - Kumar v. Superior Court · In Re the Marriage of Panich · In re the Marriage of Lydic · Marriage of Roeder v. Roeder
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(a) The child and his parents, or the child and at least one litigant, have a significant connection with this state; and (b) There is available in this state substantial evidence concerning the child’s present or future care, protection, training, and personal relationships.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Dobbs v. Dobbs“Where a custody decree is entered in Missouri, and the child and a parent move to another state, Missouri continues to have preferential jurisdiction to hear subsequent custody and visitation matters, so long as one parent continues to reside in Missouri.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Griffin v. Wade
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.