Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 789 SW2D 281 - Audio Data Corp. v. Monus

Audio Data Corp. v. Monus’s Empirical Analysis

1990

Citation profile

14
cited by 14 later decisions
2
states following
August 2006
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 10 state decisions

Appellate journey

reviewedthe decision below (from Texas 162nd Judicial District Court)

Relationships

Applies 11 U.S.C. § 362 · 11 U.S.C. § 541

Relies on Mahan & Rowsey, Inc. v. Oklahoma Natural Gas · A.H. Robins Co. v. Piccinin · Piccinin v. A. H. Robins Co. · Mortgageamerica Corporation American National Bank of Austin v. Mortgageamerica Corporation · S.I. Acquisition, Inc. v. Eastway Delivery Service, Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “is based upon allegations that if proven would benefit all [the debtor's] creditors, i.e., making more assets available to satisfy [the debtor's] debts.... If [the individual creditor's] action is not stayed it would collect its claim from a pool of assets that should be available to all creditors.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.