Dedonato v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1990
Citation profile
5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
January 2003
most recently cited
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Standley v. State · Fortune v. State · Chapa v. State · Lackey v. State · Howeth v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Article 1.14(b) provides in relevant part: If the defendant does not object to a defect, error, or irregularity of form or substance in an indictment or information before the date on which the trial on the merits commences, he waives and forfeits the right to object to the defect, error, or irregularity and he may not raise the objection on appeal or in any other postconviction proceeding.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. DeDonato v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.