Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 79 ALA 223 - Carter v. Chambers

Carter v. Chambers’s Empirical Analysis

1885

Citation profile

59
cited by 59 later decisions
6
states following
May 2016
most recently cited

59 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 59 later decisions — most recently May 2016 · most notably Mobile City Lines, Inc. v. Proctor (1961), Alabama Power Co. v. Talmadge (1921)

59 state decisions

15018851890190019101920193019401950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State v. Manchester & Lawrence Railroad · Robinson v. Western Pacific Railroad · Tanner's v. Louisville & Nashville Railroad · Hodges Bros. v. Coleman & Carroll · Carroll v. . Staten Island R.R. Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 59 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““In the trial of most issues the real contention is not over every question of law or fact that is involved directly or incidentally. The contestants are usually agreed on many questions — frequently very important questions. These become the incident — an indispensable incident — in the cause; but they are not the real subject of contestation. They are material facts, but they are not disputed facts. If the trial judge, in giving his charge to the jury, were required to state all such noneon-tested facts in the form of 'hypothesis, his charges would frequently become cumbersome and confusing, if not misleading.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. ““There is a rule, and a just one, that if a party has a witness possessing peculiar knowledge of the transaction, and supposed to be favorable to him, and fails to produce such witness when he has the means of doing so, this, in the absence of all explanation, is ground of suspicion against him that such better informed testimony would make against him.” Carter v. Chambers, 79 Ala. 223, 231 .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.