Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 79 Ariz. 319 - Green v. Snodgrass

Green v. Snodgrass’s Empirical Analysis

1955

Citation profile

27
cited by 27 later decisions
4
states following
February 2010
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 2 district · 21 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 27 later decisions — most recently February 2010 · most notably Flagstaff Affordable Housing Ltd. Partnership v. Design Alliance, Inc. (2010), City of Phoenix v. Com/Systems, Inc. (1983)

2 federal appellate · 2 district · 21 state decisions

1101955196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Weatherford v. Adams · Armstrong v. Irwin · Whalley v. George · Mallory v. Globe-Boston Copper Mining Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 27 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““As stated in the Weatherford case, supra, this court is committed to the proposition that where a contract provides what the rights of the parties to the contract shall be in the event of a breach, the court will enforce the contract as written. The plaintiff did not seek recovery of his share of the $5,000 down payment according to the terms of the contract but sought to recover the full amount of the commission based upon 5% of the purchase price of the property listed with him.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. ““We have held that where a contract provides a remedy in event of a breach, the terms of the contract will control.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.