Rodriquez v. Terry’s Empirical Analysis
1955
Citation profile
8 federal appellate · 2 district · 29 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 40 later decisions — most recently September 2001 · most notably 2 Ariz. App. 538 - Harleysville Mutual Insurance Company v. Lea (1966), Irwin v. Murphey (1956)
8 federal appellate · 2 district · 29 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 41 Cal. 2d 859 - Grant v. McAuliffe · Bristor v. Cheatham · Ingalls v. Neidlinger · Waddell v. White · Employment Security Commission v. Arizona Citrus Growers
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 40 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““Action by or against personal representative; survival of causes of action: “Every cause of action, except a cause of action for damages for breach of promise to marry, seduction, libel, slander, separate maintenance, alimony, loss of consortium or invasion of the right of privacy, shall survive the death of the person entitled thereto or liable therefor, and may be asserted by or against the personal representative of such person, provided that up on the death of the person injured, damages for pain and suffering of such injured person shall not he allowed.””
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.