79 Ark. App. 241 - Dickson v. Young’s Empirical Analysis
2002
Citation profile
12 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently January 2020
12 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Wilson v. Hunter · 30 Ark. App. 53 - Hicks v. Flanagan · Butler v. Hines · Rye v. Baumann · Barclay v. Tussey
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The Court there held “the law of adverse possession and specifically the intent required, has often been misinterpreted and misapplied. The question of intent becomes one of nuance in many cases, with hair-splitting terminology deciding the fate of the possessor’s claim.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage“[T]he doctrine of adverse possession is intended to protect one who honestly enters into possession of land in the belief that the land is his own.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Collier v. Gilmore“claimant's objective conduct from which his subjective intent to claim the land that he is possessing is derived that is determinative”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Collier v. Gilmore
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.