79 Ark. App. 303 - Gilmore v. State’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

7 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “(1) statements by an owner or by anyone in control of the object concerning its use; (2) prior convictions, if any, of an owner, or of anyone in control of the object, under any state or federal law relating to any controlled substance; (3) the proximity of the object, in time and space, to a direct violation of the controlled substances act; (4) the proximity of the object to the controlled substances; (5) the existence of any residue of controlled substances on the object; (6) direct or circumstantial evidence of the intent of the owner, or of anyone in control of the object, to deliver it to persons whom he knows, or should reasonably know, intend to use the object to manufacture a controlled substance; (7) instructions, oral or written, provided with the object concerning its use;... (13) [t]he existence and scope of legitimate uses for the object in the community; and (14) expert testimony concerning its use.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. Jones v. State

2. “attempted possession of drug paraphernalia with intent to manufacture methamphetamine.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. 91 Ark. App. 220 - Cluck v. State

3. “used in the manufacture of methamphetamine.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. 91 Ark. App. 220 - Cluck v. State