Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 79 CALAPP2D 174 - People v. Bugg

People v. Bugg’s Empirical Analysis

1947

Citation profile

26
cited by 26 later decisions
2
states following
February 2006
most recently cited

26 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 26 later decisions — most recently February 2006 · most notably 8 Cal. 3d 815 - People v. Crowe (1973), 16 Cal. App. 4th 961 - People v. Quiroga (1993)

26 state decisions

801947195019601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on People v. Schafer · People v. Craig · 78 Cal. App. 685 - People v. Rambaud · 49 Cal. App. 2d 694 - Darcy v. Moore

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 26 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““It appears that the court was mistaken in the statement that defendants had exhausted their peremptory challenges and that counsel joined in this mistake and failed to call the court’s attention to the fact that defendants were entitled to additional peremptory challenges. “There is no intimation in the record that defendant desired to exercise an additional peremptory challenge or would have done so if the mistake of law had not been made. There is nothing to indicate that an objectionable juror 'had been forced on defendant or that he was dissatisfied with the jury as selected. Under such circumstances the error cannot be held to be prejudicial.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.