Offill v. Routh’s Empirical Analysis
1926
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
December 1969
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Milner Bank & Trust Co. v. Estate of Whipple · Florence Oil & Refining Co. v. McRae
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““The statutes concerning the foreclosures of mortgages against estates are not applicable. This foreclosure was against Dunlap only. Offill had parted with the land, and the estate had no interest in it. “The basis of plaintiff’s claim against the estate was decedent’s note, not the deficiency judgment. These are of necessity for the same amount because there can be no double recovery. “The suit and judgment of foreclosure being against Dunlap an allowance of anything against the estate was not a prerequisite. The record presents no equities in favor of the estate and contains no hint that it has been prejudiced.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.