Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 79 Colo. 380 - Walker v. Wallace

Walker v. Wallace’s Empirical Analysis

1926

Citation profile

33
cited by 33 later decisions
1
states following
February 2018
most recently cited

5 federal appellate · 2 district · 24 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 33 later decisions — most recently February 2018 · most notably First National Bank v. Energy Fuels Corp. (1980), Rossi v. Colorado Pulp & Paper Co. (1931)

5 federal appellate · 2 district · 24 state decisions

1701926193019401950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Sharpe v. Baker · O'Brien v. Krenz · Tribble v. Wood · Oldfield v. Eulert · Martin v. Sprague

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 33 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “to pay as many debts of the judgment debtors and each of them as is possible....”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““As Walker was obligated to pay, if he redeemed, the entire amount for which the land had been sold, together with interest, and as there is no provision in our statute for a redemption at all except by payment of the entire sum, and not a moiety of that sum, for which the land was sold at the sale redeemed from, it follows necessarily that he may redeem, if at all, in whole only. To the same effect is Martin v. Sprague, 29 Minn. 53 , 11 N.W. 143 ; O’Brien v. Krenz, 36 Minn. 136 , 30 N.W. 458 ; Sharpe v. Baker, 51 Ind. App. 547, 571 , 96 N.E. 627 , 99 N.E. 44 .””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “[t]he right to redeem is purely statutory and is not to be enlarged by judicial interpretation, yet a liberal construction is to be given the statute allowing redemption, to the end that all the property of a debtor may pay as many debts as possible.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.