Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 79 CONNAPP 112 - Durso v. Vessichio

Durso v. Vessichio’s Empirical Analysis

2003

Citation profile

12
cited by 12 later decisions
1
states following
December 2010
most recently cited

12 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Miller v. Commissioner of Correction · Castillo v. United States · Cherokee Corp. of Linden, Virginia, Inc. v. Capital Skiing Corp. · Aetna Life & Casualty Co. v. Union Trust Co. · Grodzicki v. Grodzicki

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““(b) The establishment of a deposit account or share account which is a joint account under subsection (a) of this section is, in the absence of fraud or undue influence, or other clear and convincing evidence to the contrary, prima facie evidence of the intention of all of the named owners thereof to vest title to such account, including all subsequent deposits and additions made thereto, in such survivor or survivors, in any action or proceeding between any two or more of the depositors, respecting the ownership of such account or its proceeds. ...””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.