Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 79 CONNAPP 355 - Young v. Rutkin

Young v. Rutkin’s Empirical Analysis

2003

Citation profile

18
cited by 18 later decisions
1
states following
November 2017
most recently cited

1 district · 17 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Gordon v. Tobias · Strobel v. Strobel · Davis v. Margolis · Grayson v. Wofsey, Rosen, Kweskin & Kuriansky · Fitzmaurice v. Flynn

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Expert opinions concerning scientific, technical or other specialized knowledge may be necessary to assist the trier of fact in understanding the evidence or in determining a fact in issue. Conn. Code Evid. § 7-2.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.