Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

79 F. 992

Crossley v. Duggan

Third Circuit Court of Appeals

Decided February 22, 1897.)

Third Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1897-02-22

<p>Patents—Apparatus for Molding Earthenware.</p>

2 counsel of record

Relies on Crossley v. Duggan

Opinion by (per_curiam) · Decided 1897-02-22

¶1Patents—Apparatus for Molding Earthenware.

¶2Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of New J'ersey.

¶3For opinion, see 71 Fed. 967.

¶4Francis T. Chambers and F. C. Lowthrop, for appellant.

¶5James Buchanan, for appellee.

¶6Before DALLAS, Circuit Judge, and BUTLER and WALES, District Judges.

¶7PER CURIAM.

¶8The judges by whom this case was heard, including the late Judge WALES, had, some time previous to his death, all agreed upon the disposition to be made of it. The survivors of those who then constituted the court do not deem it necessary, under the circumstances, to do more than announce the judgment which had thus been unanimously determined upon. In accordance therewith the decree of the court below is affirmed.

/79/f1d/992 · .json · Public domain