O'Connor v. Rhodes’s Empirical Analysis
79 F.2d 146 · 1935
Citation profile
39 federal appellate · 13 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 67 later decisions — most recently July 2009 · most notably Landy v. Federal Deposit Insurance (1973), Haskins Bros. & Co. v. Morgenthau (1936)
39 federal appellate · 13 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Appellate journey
Relationships
Applies 12 U.S.C. § 192 · 12 U.S.C. § 90 · 25 U.S.C. § 156 · 31 U.S.C. § 771
Relies on Ex Parte: Edward T Young · United States v. Lee · Philadelphia Co. v. Stimson · Scott v. Armstrong · Kennedy v. Gibson
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 67 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“where it would be a vain thing to make a demand upon [it], and it is shown there is a necessity for a suit for the protection of the interests of creditors,”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“The receiver . . . becomes to all intents and purposes the bank-at least he stands in the place of the bank; . . . the receiver, after his appointment, represents the bank, its stockholders and creditors.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“a statement of appropriate and convincing facts”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.