Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

79 F.2d 340

Docket No. 7890.

Baer v. Norene

Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals

Decided Sept. 9, 1935.

Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1935-09-09

Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently May 2006

3 federal appellate ·

2 counsel of record

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by (per_curiam) · Decided 1935-09-09

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Irvin Goodman, of Portland, Or., for appellant.

¶2*341Carl C. Donaugh, U. S. Atty., and Hugh L. Biggs, Asst. U. S. Atty., both of Portland, Or., for appellee.

¶3Before. WILBUR, GARRECHT, and MATHEWS, Circuit Judges.

¶4PER CURIAM.

¶5The petitioner was convicted of burglary in the second degree in 1917; later, in 1919, he was convicted of knowingly uttering a forged bank check; and still later, in 1921, was convicted of forgery of an indorsement on a check. The only contention raised by the appellant is that these crimes do not involve moral turpitude and therefore cannot form the basis for deportation. It is clear that these offenses involve moral turpitude.

¶6The order of the lower court denying the applicatio'n of petitioner for writ of habeas corpus is affirmed.

/79/f2d/340 · .json · Public domain