Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 79 F.2d 524 - In re Ridder

In re Ridder’s Empirical Analysis

79 F.2d 524 · 1935

Citation profile

18
cited by 18 later decisions
4
states following
November 1980
most recently cited

6 federal appellate · 2 district · 4 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 18 later decisions — most recently November 1980

6 federal appellate · 2 district · 4 state decisions

80193519401950196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on In re Adams · Schnitzer v. Buerger · Mohler v. Norris · In re Warth

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “for alimony due or to become due, or for maintenance or support of wife or child,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.