Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 79 F.2d 611 - Gamaldi v. Colon

Gamaldi v. Colon’s Empirical Analysis

79 F.2d 611 · 1935

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
2
states following
August 1963
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 4 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently August 1963

2 federal appellate · 4 state decisions

401935194019501960decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Black v. . Ellis · In re Riggi Bros. · In re James, Inc. · Leffert v. . Jackman · Karasik v. People's Trust Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “S. 558, held that, where actual consent to the execution of the mortgage by stockholders owning two-thirds of the shares entitled to vote was proved, the mortgage was not void though strict compliance with the statute was lacking. It should be noted, however, that the Court of Appeals affirmed this case on another ground, viz. that the mortgage in question was in effect a purchase-money mortgage to which the statute did not apply. See Black v. Ellis, 197 N.Y. 402 , 90 N.E. 958 . That court has held that, where the consent of stockholders holding the statutory number of shares was not given, the mortgage was void. Leffert v. Jackman, 227 N.Y. 310 , 125 N.E. 446 . And so have we. In re James, Inc., 2 Cir., 30 F.2d 555 ; In re Astell Engineering & Iron Works, 2 Cir., 284 F. 967 .””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.