Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 79 F.2d 821 - Carney v. United States

Carney v. United States’s Empirical Analysis

79 F.2d 821 · 1935

Citation profile

21
cited by 21 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
4
states following
May 1985
most recently cited

10 federal appellate · 1 district · 5 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 21 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently May 1985

10 federal appellate · 1 district · 5 state decisions

70193519401950196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Schuyler National Bank v. Bollong · Moore v. United States · Minner v. United States · Coulston v. United States · Astwood v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The attack upon the search warrant is twofold; the complaint being that the defendant is not named therein, and that the premises are not with particularity described. The first challenge to the warrant is based upon title 11, section 3 of the Act of June 15th, 1917, being section 613, title 18 USCA, which provides that a search warrant may not issue but upon ‘probable cause, supported by affidavit, naming or describing the person and particularly describing the property and the place to be searched.’ The contention is obviously without merit. The clear meaning of the section requires that a person to be searched must be named or described. The instant warrant contains no mandate for any search other than that of property, and the only question here is the sufficiency of the property description.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.