Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

79 F.2d 989

Docket No. 7864.

Dillingham v. A. C. Aderhold

Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals

Decided Oct. 31, 1935.

Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1935-10-31

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently September 1993

3 counsel of record

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by (per_curiam) · Decided 1935-10-31

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Leo Scott Dillingham, in pro. per.

¶2Lawrence S. Camp, U. S. Atty., Harvey H. Tisinger, Asst. U. S. Atty., and H. T. Nichols, Sp. Atty. to U. S. Atty., all of Atlanta, Ga., for appellee.

¶3Before FOSTER, SIBLEY, and WALKER, Circuit Judges.

¶4PER CURIAM.

¶5The judgment is affirmed.

/79/f2d/989 · .json · Public domain