United States v. Smith’s Empirical Analysis
79 F.3d 1208 · 1996
Citation profile
6 federal appellate · 22 district · 5 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 52 later decisions — most recently March 2021 · most notably State v. FERNANDO A. (2009), United States v. Campbell (2014)
6 federal appellate · 22 district · 5 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 3141 (Bail Reform Act of 1984) · 18 U.S.C. § 3142 (Bail Reform Act of 1984) · 18 U.S.C. § 3161 (§ 101 of the Speedy Trial Act of 1974)
Relies on United States v. Delker · United States v. Hazime · United States v. Edwards · United States v. Hurtado · United States v. Acevedo-Ramos
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 52 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(1) [t]he nature and circumstances of the offense charged, including whether the offense ... involves ... a controlled substance; •. ' (2) the weight of evidence against the person; (3) the history and characteristics of the person, including ... the person’s character, . physical and mental, condition, family ties, employment, financial resources, length of residence in the community, community ties, past conduct, history relating to drug or alcohol abuse, criminal history, and record concerning appearance at court proceedings; and [[Image here]] (4) the nature and seriousness of the danger to any person or the community that would be posed by the person’s release.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[1] the nature and circumstances of the offense charged, including whether the offense is a crime of violence or involves a narcotic drug; [2] the weight of the evidence against the person; [3] various personal information including character, employment, past conduct, and so on; and [4] the nature and seriousness of the danger to any person or the community that would be posed by the person's release.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[T]he indictment alone would have been enough to raise the rebuttable presumption that no condition would reasonably assure the safety of the community.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.