Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 79 F.3d 1348 - Greene v. United States

Greene v. United States’s Empirical Analysis

79 F.3d 1348 · 1996

Citation profile

57
cited by 57 later decisions
2
states following
November 2019
most recently cited

29 federal appellate · 2 district · 2 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 57 later decisions — most recently November 2019 · most notably Bf Goodrich, California Public Employees' Retirement System v. WorldCom, Inc. (2004)

29 federal appellate · 2 district · 2 state decisions

230199620002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 26 U.S.C. § 1001 · 26 U.S.C. § 1212 · 26 U.S.C. § 1256 · 26 U.S.C. § 170 · 26 U.S.C. § 2501

Relies on United States v. Ron Pair Enterprises, Inc. · Montana v. United States · Commissioner v. Sunnen · Rubin v. United States · United States v. Burke

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 57 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(1)any regulated futures contract, (2) any foreign currency contract, (3) any nonequity option, and (4) any dealer equity option.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “ancient maxim expressio unius est exclusio alterius (mention of one impliedly excludes others)”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “When two statutes are in conflict, that statute which addresses the matter at issue in specific terms controls over a statute which addresses the issue in general terms, unless Congress has manifested a contrary aim.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.