Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

79 F.3d 17

Docket No. 94-30513.

Marts v. Hines

Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals

Decided March 14, 1996.

Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1996-03-14

Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently July 1997

3 federal appellate ·

1 counsel of record

Relies on Marts v. Hines

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1996-03-14

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Sidney Marts, New Orleans, LA, pro se.

¶2Before POLITZ, Chief Judge, and KING, GARWOOD, JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, JONES, SMITH, DUHÉ, WIENER, BARKSDALE, EMILIO M. GARZA, DeMOSS, BENAVIDES, STEWART, PARKER and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

¶3BY THE COURT:

¶4A majority of the Judges in active service, on the court’s own motion, having determined to have this case reheard en banc,

¶5*18IT IS ORDERED that this cause shall be reheard by the court en banc without oral argument.

/79/f3d/17 · .json · Public domain