Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 79 F.3d 20 - Wagner v. McDermott, Inc.

Wagner v. McDermott, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis

79 F.3d 20 · 1996

Citation profile

14
cited by 14 later decisions
1
states following
March 2013
most recently cited

7 federal appellate · 3 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently March 2013

7 federal appellate · 3 state decisions

70199620002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 33 U.S.C. § 901 · 33 U.S.C. § 902 · 33 U.S.C. § 905 · 43 U.S.C. § 1333

Relies on Knapp v. Chevron USA, Inc. · Domingue v. Ocean Drilling & Exploration Co. · Doucet v. Gulf Oil Corp. · Hollier v. Union Texas Petroleum Corp.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “B. Any provision contained in, collateral to, or affecting an agreement pertaining to a well for oil, gas, or water, or drilling for minerals which occur in a solid, liquid, gaseous, or other state, is void and unenforceable to the extent that it purports to or does provide for defense or indemnity, or either, to the indemnitee against loss or liability for damages arising out of or resulting from death or bodily injury to persons, which is caused by or results from the sole or concurrent negligence or fault (strict liability) of the indemnitee, or an agent, employee, or an independent contractor who is directly responsible to the indemnitee. C. The term “agreement,” as it pertains to a well for oil, gas, or water, or drilling for minerals which occur in a solid, liquid, gaseous, or other state, as used in this Section, means any agreement or understanding, written or oral, concerning any operations related to the exploration, development, production, or transportation of oil, gas, or water, or drilling for minerals which occur in a solid, liquid, gaseous, or other state, including but not limited to drilling, deepening, reworking, repairing, improving, testing, treating, perforating, acidizing, logging, conditioning, altering, plugging, or otherwise rendering services in or in connection with any well drilled for the purpose of producing or excavating, constructing, improving, or otherwise rendering services in connection with any mine shaft, drift, or other structure intend”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “Here, McDermott entered into a contract for welders to work on a fixed platform it was constructing. McDer-mott was not acting in its capacity as vessel owner but only as a contractor who incidentally utilized a vessel to accomplish its work. The fact that McDermott happens to own the vessel does not place the contract within § 905(c). McDermott argues that because Plaintiff asserted a § 905(b) claim, § 905(c) must govern the contract dispute. While § 905(b) liability is a requisite for § 905(c) applicability, the contract must be of the type covered by § 905(c). It must be with a vessel. The McDermott-Capital/Landry contract is not.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “Nothing contained in subsection (b) of this section shall preclude the enforcement according to its terms of any reciprocal indemnity provision whereby the employer of a person entitled to receive benefits under this Act by virtue of section 4 of the Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act (43 USC 1333) and the vessel agreed to defend and indemnify the other for cost of defense and loss or liability for damages arising out of or resulting from death or bodily injury to their employees.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.