Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 79 F.3d 281 - Flor v. BOT Financial Corp.

Flor v. BOT Financial Corp.’s Empirical Analysis

79 F.3d 281 · 1996

Citation profile

103
cited by 103 later decisions
November 2018
most recently cited

13 federal appellate · 8 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 103 later decisions — most recently November 2018 · most notably In Re Michael Watson, 858 F. Supp. 2d 306 - Federal Housing Finance Agency v. UBS Americas, Inc. (2012)

13 federal appellate · 8 district ·

470199620002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Coopers & Lybrand v. Livesay · Connecticut National Bank v. Germain · Toibb v. Radloff · Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 93,657 Leasco Data Processing Equipment Corporation, Leasco World Trade Company (u.k.) Ltd. v. Robert Maxwell, Leasco Data Processing Equipment Corporation, Leasco World Trade Company (u.k.) Limited v. Isidore Kerman · Sonnax Industries, Inc. v. Tri Component Products Corp.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 103 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “an immediate appeal from the order may materially advance the ultimate termination of the litigation.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[M]ere presence of a disputed issue that is a question of first impression, standing alone, is insufficient to demonstrate a substantial ground for difference of opinion.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “[u]nlike the district court, which has discretion to hear appeals from interlocutory bankruptcy court orders, § 158(a), our jurisdiction is limited to 'appeals from all final decisions, judgments, orders, and decrees' of the district court.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.