Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 79 F.3d 409 - United States v. Morris

United States v. Morris’s Empirical Analysis

79 F.3d 409 · 1996

Citation profile

24
cited by 24 later decisions
1
states following
October 2005
most recently cited

18 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Griffin v. United States · Atlantic Richfield Co. v. Newman Oil Co. · United States v. Felix · Spencer Gifts, Inc. v. Olitsky · Kachina Plywood, Inc. v. Hurt

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “acquittal of the substantive offense does not preclude use of the same facts as evidence of noncriminal overt acts in furtherance of a conspiracy”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “Because Rule 403 requires the exclusion of relevant evidence, it is an extraordinary measure that should be used sparingly.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “substantially outweighed by the danger of unfair prejudice, confusion of the issues, or misleading the jury.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.