Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 79 F.3d 584 - United States v. Hernandez

United States v. Hernandez’s Empirical Analysis

79 F.3d 584 · 1996

Citation profile

36
cited by 36 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
March 2021
most recently cited

21 federal appellate · 2 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 36 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently March 2021 · most notably United States v. LaBonte (1997), United States v. Branham (1996)

21 federal appellate · 2 district ·

3001996200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. · Mistretta v. United States · Stinson v. United States · Smith v. United States · Ratzlaf et Ux United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 36 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The Commission shall assure that the guidelines specify a sentence to a term of imprisonment at or near the maximum term authorized for categories of defendants in which the defendant is eighteen years old or older and [has been convicted of a felony that is either a violent crime or a specified controlled substance offense, and has at least two such prior convictions].”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “the maximum term of imprisonment authorized for the offense of conviction ... not including any increase in that maximum term under a sentencing enhancement provision that applies because of the defendant's prior criminal record.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “which provides in pertinent part this qualification for that enhancement: 15 A defendant is a career offender if (1) the defendant was at least eighteen years old at the time of the instant offense, (2) the instant offense of conviction is a felony that is either a crime of violence or a controlled substance offense, and (3) the defendant has at least two prior felony convictions of either a crime of violence or a controlled substance offense. 16 Amendment 506 to the Commentary to § 4B1.1 provides that”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.