Board of Education of Oak Park & River Forest High School District 200 v. Illinois State Board of Education’s Empirical Analysis
79 F.3d 654 · 1996
Citation profile
29 federal appellate · 3 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 65 later decisions — most recently May 2024 · most notably Reid ex rel. Reid v. District of Columbia (2005), PMC, Inc. v. Sherwin-Williams Co. (1998)
29 federal appellate · 3 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp. · Honig v. Doe · Behrens v. Pelletier · School Committee of the Town of Burlington v. Department of Education · Gulfstream Aerospace Corp. v. Mayacamas Corp.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 65 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“encompasses the full range of equitable remedies and therefore empowers a court to order adult compensatory education if necessary to cure a violation”
9 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Ssgt Rg, Usaf, Ag v. Fort Bragg Dependent Schools · Evanston Community Consolidated School District Number 65 v. Michael M. And Christine M., Parents of John M., John M., by His Parents and Next Friends, Michael M. And Christine M. v. Evanston Community Consolidated School District Number 65 and Dr. Hardy Ray Murphy, Its Superintendent, Sued in His Official Capacity“During the pendency of any proceedings conducted pursuant to this section, unless the State or local educational agency and the parents or guardian otherwise agree, the child shall remain in the then current educational placement of such child.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“The purpose of the stay-put provision is to give the child's parents the choice of keeping the child in his existing program until their dispute with the school authorities is resolved.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.