United States v. Alcaraz-Garcia’s Empirical Analysis
79 F.3d 769 · 1996
Citation profile
21 federal appellate · 3 district · 2 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 51 later decisions — most recently August 2019 · most notably In Re Thomas James Dyer (2003), United States v. Gilbert (2001)
21 federal appellate · 3 district · 2 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1001 (Comprehensive Thrift and Bank Fraud Prosecution and Taxpayer Recovery Act of 1990) · 18 U.S.C. § 1956 (§ 1352 of the Money Laundering Control Act of 1986) · 18 U.S.C. § 981 (§ 1366 of the Money Laundering Control Act of 1986) · 18 U.S.C. § 982 (§ 1366 of the Money Laundering Control Act of 1986) · 21 U.S.C. § 853 (§ 413 of the Controlled Substances Act) · 28 U.S.C. § 1291 · 31 U.S.C. § 5313 · 31 U.S.C. § 5317
Relies on Calero-Toledo v. Pearson Yacht Leasing Co. · Renne v. Geary · United States v. $19191000 in US Currency R · United States v. Reckmeyer · United States v. Lavin
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 51 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Gratuitous deposit is a deposit for which the depositary receives no consideration beyond the mere possession of the thing deposited.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. United States of America, Eytan Mayzel, Claimant-Appellee v. $100,348.00 in U.S. Currency, United States of America, Eytan Mayzel, Claimant-Appellant v. $100,348.00 in U.S. Currency, United States of America, Eric Amiel, Claimant-Appellant v. $100,348.00 in U.S. Currency · United States v. $10034800 in US Currency“to deliver various sums from their savings to their respective families in Colima.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. United States of America, Eytan Mayzel, Claimant-Appellee v. $100,348.00 in U.S. Currency, United States of America, Eytan Mayzel, Claimant-Appellant v. $100,348.00 in U.S. Currency, United States of America, Eric Amiel, Claimant-Appellant v. $100,348.00 in U.S. Currency · United States v. $10034800 in US Currency“We review the district court's interpretation of federal forfeiture law de novo . However, we review the district court's findings of fact for clear error.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.