Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

79 F. App'x 606

United States v. Adderly

U.S. Courts of Appeals

Decided October 31, 2003

U.S. Courts of Appeals · decided 2003-10-31

Cited by 1 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently April 2004

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2003-10-31

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1Lorenzo Adderly appeals from the district court’s order denying his motion for a downward departure in his sentence. Because Adderly had no pending challenge to his sentence and no court had ordered his resentencing, we affirm the district court’s determination that it lacked jurisdiction to grant the motion for a downward departure. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

¶2AFFIRMED.

/79/fappx/606 · .json · Public domain