Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

79 F. App'x 78

United States v. Goad

U.S. Courts of Appeals

Decided October 22, 2003

U.S. Courts of Appeals · decided 2003-10-22

Relies on Anders v. California

Decided 2003-10-22

PER CURIAM.*

¶1Private counsel appointed to represent Tommie Curtis Goad has requested leave to withdraw and has filed a brief as required by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Goad has filed a response to the instant motion. Our independent review of the brief, the response, and the record discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities, and the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.

¶2MOTION GRANTED; APPEAL DISMISSED.

¶3 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir R. 47.5.4.

/79/fappx/78 · .json · Public domain