Adams v. Hiatt’s Empirical Analysis
1948
Citation profile
1 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 10 U.S.C. § 1475 · 10 U.S.C. § 1564
Relies on Federal Crop Ins Corporation v. Merrill · Quirin Haupt Kerling Burger Heinck Thiel Neubauer United States Quirin v. Cox Usa 6 · Yamashita Yamashita v. Styer US · Eagles Nj v. United States · Harlan v. McGourin
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““The case was carefully reviewed by the Staff Judge Advocate and by a Board of Review. This is the process of appellate review provided by Congress to correct trial errors in prescribing the procedure for administration of military justice. This Court in habeas corpus does not sit in appellate review over such proceedings and the proceedings cannot be collaterally impeached for mere error or irregularity commit-.' ted within the sphere of authority of the military court. * * *””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. White v. Humphrey
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.